PatronQuo.com Blog

August 4, 2010

Author Uses Pay-Out Money To Patronize Another Writer On PatronQuo.com

Filed under: Patronage — admin @ 2:57 pm

Less than a day after receiving her first pay-out earnings from PatronQuo.com, author Cori Jones decided to give back to the community by patronizing author Holly Jahangiri’s The Trouble With Oliver.

With her latest patron contribution, Cori Jones has achieved another landmark for PatronQuo.com: She is the first person to occupy prominent ranking placement in both the author and patron rankings.

She now takes third position in the All-Time Patron Rankings, and occupies top money position as an author in the novel submission category.

The Trouble With Oliver widens its lead in the top money position for all-time short story submission earnings.

Coming so soon after the launch of PatronQuo.com, it is still too early to see how the rankings will ultimately shake out in the coming months.

A huge number of talented fiction authors – published and unpublished, agented and unagented – still remain unaware of the Web’s hottest initiative to promote underappreciated literary talent.

As a result, PatronQuo’s current relatively small number of talented writers are the disproportionate beneficiaries of the increasing traffic in visits from readers, fans, and prospective patrons.

With PatronQuo’s promotional badges in place, currently participating writers have an early jump to make a pitch for patrons by posting their eye-appealing story badges on other web sites.

Quite simply, PatronQuo offers the best opportunity for talented writers to take matters into their own hands by marketing their short stories and novels online through PatronQuo.com, as they reach out to widen their fan base and their opportunity to make extra money online from their tales.

June 20, 2010

Inviting Selected Patrons To Patronize Writers…On Our Dime

Filed under: Patronage — Tags: — admin @ 2:11 am

Realizing that the literary community has yet to fully appreciate the vision and potential of an online patronage model for emerging literary talent, PatronQuo.com is putting its own funds out for selected patrons to choose which of PatronQuo’s participating writers are most worthy of getting the patronage monies.

The idea is simple: The selected patrons pick who we pay…and who rises up in the ranking charts.

Why is the offer open only to selected patrons by invitation? Because we want the process to be as objective as possible, to ensure that our patronage monies are going only toward the stories that these patrons deem to be the best, and so that the funds we’ve set aside for this special initiative won’t be “gamed” by self-selecting fans with a personal connection to a writer.

Why doesn’t PatronQuo simply select the stories to patronize? Because we feel that those patrons we select by invitation – editors, publishers, literary journals, and presses – are far more suitable to decide among the best on our web site.

For this initiative, we’ve set aside a $200 fund. How that amount is spread or concentrated among the participating writers will be determined by the invited patrons, each of whom will be entitled to patronize a story on our dime – in this case, $5 per invited patron.

Each invited patron, in turn, will get their name prominently associated with the story they have chosen to patronize on our dime.

Readers, in turn, will get to see which patron chose which story, and can follow the chosen writers’ progress in the writers’ performance ranking charts.

Should any of our invited patrons want to go beyond the single $5 payment we’re making on their behalf, they can always choose to patronize more stories – or boost the patronage on the story they chose – through their own funds, which will add to their own performance rankings as patrons. If they choose to do so, we will match their patronage dollar for dollar, directing it to the writer(s) they’ve chosen to patronize, until the $200 fund we’ve set aside is exhausted.

In this manner, we won’t know until the fund is exhausted whether 40 patrons or just 4 patrons from our invited pool will exhaust the fund. That will be for the patrons to determine.

In the meantime, all other fans and readers are invited to step up and offer their own patronage for the stories they deem to be the best.

Remember, PatronQuo.com is about promoting the judgments and tastes of the participating patrons as much as it is about promoting the talent of the participating writers.

Recognizing that readers will value the sophisticated literary judgments of paying patrons, our aim is that PatronQuo.com will inevitably become the go-to place for people looking for the most reliable guide to the most creative, mind-blowing literature in any venue – whether online or in print.

And for that service, the most discerning patrons on PatronQuo should achieve as much of a fanatical following, among our readers, as the writers they’ve chosen to patronize.

Let the literary death match begin!…and let the dollars fall where they may.

June 10, 2010

Extra Money For Writing Short Stories This Month On PatronQuo.com

Filed under: Patronage — Tags: , — admin @ 12:29 am

Just a number of weeks into its launch, the promotional website for fiction writers, PatronQuo.com, announces the creation of its Patronage Matching Fund this month.

As J Leland Kupferberg, one of the owners of PatronQuo, explains: “It’s our way – in this initial stage of the launch – to put our own money behind the initiative to support writers through a patronage model, benefiting both the writers (as the fund recipients) and the patrons (promotionally, as the prominently showcased donors).”

Mr. Kupferberg, who describes himself as a “frustrated writer,” set up PatronQuo.com as a means for talented, undiscovered fiction writers to take their case directly to the public instead of fruitlessly waiting out the years to find an agent or publisher.

In its opening phase, PatronQuo.com is seeking out talented creative writers to submit short stories for its short fiction category. The website features a number of different ranking charts for the participating writers and their patrons, so that visitors to the site may see which writer is making money from their posted stories. The money rankings, in fact, set PatronQuo apart from all other short story submission sites, most of which offer little more than an option for feedback comments from fellow writers.

“We’re not here just to offer emotional support for writers,” Mr. Kupferberg explains. “The key here is to get the talented, undiscovered writers the crucial financial support they need to keep writing.”

To do that, Mr. Kupferberg expects that PatronQuo.com will generate interest well beyond the confines of the literary community, to those who might be interested in the “blood sport” of a good old-fashioned ongoing literary death match between the participating writers. “We live in an age where people are as interested in the box office performance of the movie they just saw as they are in its plot. So we’ve just applied that mass psychological appeal for writers and their stories – tracking how much patronage they attract through our site.”

Mr. Kupferberg also expects that the essential competitive aspect of PatronQuo – as each talented writer vies to prove their story most worthy of patronage – will, in turn, prompt a steady supply of readers and fans to mix in and become part of the action. PatronQuo achieves this by billing itself as a website that promotes and showcases the patrons just as much as the writers they patronize.

In this respect, the patron’s contribution not only helps a writer’s story to move up the charts, but also garners the patron their own placement in the rankings, along with the showcasing of their name with the story they’ve patronized.

Presented in an eye-pleasing frame, each posted short story on the site is “crowned” with a prominent scroll that announces the top month’s patron, whose name – when clicked – leads to that patron’s profile, where visitors can learn more about them, and perhaps visit a link to their web site.

“See, we’ve taken this beyond the conventional advertising model,” explains Mr. Kupferberg. “Number one, people are now trained to ignore advertising as a distraction, as irrelevant to their main activity. Our goal is to focus that attention on the patron, who is now a crucial part of the action. And number two, we’ve created a model where any patron who wants to market their services to the literary community is essentially giving back to that community in the very act of communicating with them.”

It’s a powerful incentive to come on board as a patron, Mr. Kupferberg believes, but one that will at first be a difficult sell, particularly in view of its essentially unique quality. In order to get the idea sparking faster, PatronQuo has decided to create a Patronage Matching Fund this month.

With a set budget of $200, PatronQuo will offer to match, dollar-for-dollar, a patron’s payment toward a writer until the budget is exhausted. As the minimum patron payment, for instance, is set at $5, a participating patron will be credited as making a $10 patron payment – split up or focused on any story of the patron’s choosing. If the participating patron’s payment is $50, they’ll be credited with a $100 payment toward any writers of their choosing -and so on, until the budget is exhausted. “We’ve set it so that those patrons who jump in early will have first crack at our budget – and a boost in the rankings,” Mr. Kupferberg asserts. As a hedge against gaming the system, the Patronage Matching Fund is only open to patrons by invitation.

In the end, Mr Kupferberg trusts that both the patrons and the writers will be mutually enriched through their participation on PatronQuo.com – the writers, by receiving the overwhelming bulk of the patronage payments; and the patrons, by prominently showcasing themselves to their target market while signaling their support for this community.

“And who knows?” Mr. Kupferberg muses, growing starry-eyed at the thought. “Perhaps the masses of fiction readers out there will be stirred to action, each stepping up in their own small way to support their favorite authors, so that they can continue to do what they love – to write and put out more work for the fans.”

Surely a dream worth patronizing.

Powered by WordPress